Untitled

edit

No consensus to delete. Deletion debate below. Cecropia 03:20, 24 Apr 2004 (UTC)


  • Delete. Seems pretty obscure, no evidence of anything notable. Web results include his two sites (IOUMA & Fluxus Heidelberg), some web sites linking to those, and some web sites posting "interviews" between him and other mail artists. I wouldn't consider it unthinkable if there were votes to keep, but absent evidence to the contrary, my judgment is that he's beyond the pale of relevance. Postdlf 20:35 17 Apr 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. I agree. As below: If there's any info worth saving, merge into mail art. Cribcage 22:45, 17 Apr 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. See my comments at IUOMA vote to delete. --Daniel C. Boyer 15:53, 18 Apr 2004 (UTC)
  • I'm a bit undecided on this one. I agree that the page reads like a vanity page. But looking trough the google hits he seems to have some independent notability. There is a chess player out there with the same name though, I doubt they are the same. Also given his birth date and his mode of art (mail) it is possible that not some much is on the internet.
  • Keep. anthony (see warning)