Talk:SOLRAD 4/GA1
GA Review
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Simongraham (talk · contribs) 15:09, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
This looks a very interesting article nominated by Neopeius. I will start this review shortly. simongraham (talk) 15:09, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
Criteria
editThe six good article criteria:
- Well written
- the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and
- it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout etc.
- Verifiable
- it contains a list of all references, presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
- all inline citations are from reliable sources;
- it contains no original research; and
- it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism.
- Broad in its coverage
- it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
- it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail.
- Neutral
- it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to different points of view.
- Stable
- it does not change significantly from day to day because of any ongoing edit war or content dispute.
- Illustrated
- images are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
- images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
Review
editThis article is ready for promotion. It is well written with good references and relevant images. The editor has taken note of the previous GA reviews (SOLRAD 1 and SOLRAD 3). @Neopeius: Congratulations on another Good Article. simongraham (talk) 15:20, 28 December 2020 (UTC)