Talk:Sacco & Vanzetti (1971 film)
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Flourbomb in topic Expanded article
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move 23 August 2015
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved to Sacco e Vanzetti (1971 film), '06 film moved to Sacco and Vanzetti (2006 film). Jenks24 (talk) 07:02, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
- Sacco e Vanzetti → Sacco
and& Vanzetti (1971 film) - Sacco and Vanzetti (film) → Sacco and Vanzetti (2006 film)
– I was going to propose "Sacco and Vanzetti (documentary film)" for the 2006 film, but I guess consistency by year is more suitable. (EDIT: I found out many official English sources use ampersand for the 1971 film.) See below. George Ho (talk) 00:39, 23 August 2015 (UTC) Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 13:14, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support both for the English wiki.--Froglich (talk) 06:48, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
- @Froglich: I can be wrong about usage on the 1971 film. --George Ho (talk) 17:03, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support both but not sure about the ampersand, if we are going to use the Italian, why muddle it? Pincrete (talk) 15:14, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
- @Pincrete: How about Sacco e Vanzetti (1971 film) ([1][2][3][4]) or Sacco and Vanzetti (1971 film) ([5]? Sources use both per source: [6][7][8] Since usage is divided per WP:UE, you can pick whatever feels most comfortable to you. George Ho (talk) 17:00, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support either 'e' or 'and' … it is hard to see which is most used for the film (many of these examples are talking about the case). My feeling was that no one was going to type '&' in a search box. I don't know what policy is about the use of '&' in titles. Pincrete (talk) 17:19, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
- Not a policy but a guideline: WP:& says that '&' can be used in article titles and proper nouns but must be normally avoided elsewhere. George Ho (talk) 17:24, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support either 'e' or 'and' … it is hard to see which is most used for the film (many of these examples are talking about the case). My feeling was that no one was going to type '&' in a search box. I don't know what policy is about the use of '&' in titles. Pincrete (talk) 17:19, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
- @Pincrete: How about Sacco e Vanzetti (1971 film) ([1][2][3][4]) or Sacco and Vanzetti (1971 film) ([5]? Sources use both per source: [6][7][8] Since usage is divided per WP:UE, you can pick whatever feels most comfortable to you. George Ho (talk) 17:00, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
- Relisting comment. Clear consensus to move, we just need to decide with of e/&/and to use for the 1971 film. Jenks24 (talk) 13:14, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- keep e, add (1971 film) In ictu oculi (talk) 20:10, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Expanded article
editI've expanded this article, and deleted its stub status. Most of the new information for the expansion came from the German Wikipedia page Sacco und Vanzetti (film). I've followed the naming conventions agreed earlier on this page, so that
- Sacco e Vanzetti is used for the film
- Sacco and Vanzetti is used when talking about the characters
- Sacco & Vanzetti is used in the external link to the iTunes page because that's what they're calling the film.
I'm still in the process of writing a 'Synopsis' section which I should hopefully have complete by the end of this week. Flourbomb (talk) 18:13, 25 November 2015 (UTC)