Talk:Sadhana Mahila Sangha

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk) 04:38, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that Sadhana Mahila Sangha protected Bangalore sex workers from the police, from HIV, but they now help feed them during the pandemic? "the police often harass sex workers", "HIV/AIDS outbreak, and are aware of the dangers of Covid-19 too. As far as we know, no one has done any sex work in more than a month"
  • ALT1:... that Bangalore's sex workers had to work with condoms after HIV but Sadhana Mahila Sangha has to feed them after coronavirus? "With HIV at least we could use a condom and continue. What will we do now? We cannot wear a full condom suit!”
  • ALT2 (for IWD day):... that four International Women's Days ago the President of India gave a top award to Sadhana Mahila Sangha who helped to protect Bangalore's sex workers from the police? pic of award and "the police often harass sex workers"

Created by Victuallers (talk). Self-nominated at 21:31, 23 January 2021 (UTC).

• QPQ = Iti Tyagi

• Article is new, lomg enough and neutral. It cites sources inline. "Earwig's Copyvio Detector" reports no text similarities. The hook, I prefer ALT2, is well-formatted and interesting. Its length is within limit. Its fact is cited nline. QPQ is missing. Approval will follow after addressing the issue. CeeGee 10:31, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Thx @CeeGee: - sorry I forgot the QPQ (see above) Victuallers (talk) 19:35, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

• OK. Everything is fine now. Good to go. CeeGee 06:09, 4 February 2021 (UTC)