Talk:Sahajananda Saraswati
(Redirected from Talk:Sahajananda)
Latest comment: 13 years ago by ErikHaugen in topic Requested move
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sahajananda Saraswati article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. There is no consensus for move, also WP:NCIN and WP:NCP indicate titles generally shouldn't be used. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 19:38, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
Sahajananda → Swami Sahajananda — Relisted. --rgpk (comment) 17:29, 3 February 2011 (UTC) In keeping with other articles on Hindu sannyasins. I would have moved it myself, but the page already exists as a redirect. --Devadaru (talk) 13:27, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
- Comment - his most common title appears to be Sri Swami Sahajananda. — Amakuru (talk) 13:41, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
- "Sri" is generally omitted in Wikipedia articles, considered as an honorific, while "Swami" is now being included. There was some discussion about this at Talk:Swami_Bhaskarananda_Saraswati, and also previously at Talk:Swami Vivekananda (somewhere in the archives, I suspect).—Devadaru (talk) 14:07, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose. We avoid using religious honorifics whenever possible because of unavoidable neutrality issues. In this case, as with most people titled "swami", the title is avoidable. — Gavia immer (talk) 05:03, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.