Talk:Salmon Creek Dam
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Salmon Creek Dam article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Salmon Creek Dam has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 27, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Salmon Creek Dam (pictured) in Juneau, the capital of Alaska, was built in 1914 and was the world's first constant-angle arch dam? |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
something wrong with these figures
edit"Bank to bank, the crest length is 195.2 meters (640 ft). The dam envisaged storage of about 18,000 acre ft at the Full Reservoir level while it is 445 acre ft at 25 ft depth of water, and the reservoir extended to a length of 195.2 miles (314.1 km). "
The reservoir is not 195.2 miles long. This figure might be mistaken from the crest length of the dam, 195.2 meters.Eregli bob (talk) 21:01, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
- The reservoir is 1 mile long. 195.2 miles was an inadvdertant error. It is corrected now. -- N.V.V. Char Talk . 15:30, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
Unusual unit - 'tonnes/ft'
editThe text says:
- "An ice pressure of 10 tonnes/ft length of the dam was considered based on the rim conditions of the reservoir and the design was also checked for an ice load 20 tonnes/ft;"
Can anyone give a reference for 'tonne/ft'. It doesn't seem right. Lightmouse (talk) 10:56, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
- I think it may mean tonnes per foot as in pressure but the structure and grammar in the sentence is confusing.--NortyNort (Holla) 11:39, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
Pressure is force per unit area. The denominator 'foot' is length, not area. Furthermore, tonne=1000 kg and it is unusual to see kg/ft which makes me think it's an error and really means one of the variants of 'ton' more common in America. Lightmouse (talk) 12:34, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
- The reference no 3 gives the following text. "When the water in the reservoir level with the bottom of the spillway, an ice pressure of 10 tons per running foot was provided for. This was considered adequate as the rim slope of the reservoir sides at higher levels near the dam is not sufficient to confine the ice under heavier pressure. It was also established that even with an ice pressure of 20 tons/ft the resulting compression on the concrete would be provided for with a sfatey factor of 5." The terminology tons/running feet implies an area of 1 sqft of the dam. -- N.V.V. Char Talk . 15:48, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
Aha. So it is a US short ton of 907 kg, not a tonne of 1000 kg. If 'running foot' = square foot, then that clears it up as pressure. It's apparently 10 tons force per square foot (500 kPa) and 20 tons force per square foot (1000 kPa). I think the text could be improved to that effect. Lightmouse (talk) 16:02, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Salmon Creek Dam. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://simscience.org/cracks/advanced/arch_hist1.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:20, 31 March 2016 (UTC)