Talk:Salton Buttes/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ganesha811 (talk · contribs) 03:34, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	No issues with spelling or grammar. Recommend changing UK English spellings (kilometres, millimetres) to American English per MOS:TIES but no big deal.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Concerns addressed.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Very good.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Sources check out. Lots of them, no original research, no direct quotations, etc. Nothing likely to be challenged. Scientific citation guidelines followed.
	2c. it contains no original research.	Pass.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	Pass.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Pass. Thorough and comprehensive.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	Pass after consideration.
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	Pass.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Most work completed in 2018.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	No issues.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Pass.
	7. Overall assessment.	PASS

Hi! Starting my review of this page. Ganesha811 (talk) 03:34, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Update: First runthrough of review above. Still need to check for copyright issues. Ganesha811 (talk) 04:10, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

@Ganesha811: Remedied some lead issues. Normally we don't add references to it, however. I'd say the coordinates are pertinent information and thus keep them. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:42, 18 July 2019 (UTC)