Talk:Samajwadi Party
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Samajwadi Party article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Samajwadi Party. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Samajwadi Party at the Reference desk. |
 | This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Non Free Logo Discussion
editThere is a discussion going on at Wikipedia:Non-free_content_review#Multiple_non-free_logos_for_same_organisation about copyrighted party logos. Note that File:Samajwadi.PNG is copyrighted. Please join the discussion to save the Indian Political Party symbols from being deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.229.165.143 (talk) 07:50, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Krantikari Ramesh Yadav Hero Bhaiya Kranti Ramesh Yadav Hero Bhaiya (talk) 06:04, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
Edit wars on this page
edit@Sitush:, @Kautilya3:, @Dharmadhyaksha: edit wars going on here from anonymous accounts. please help resolve. ChunnuBhai (talk) 06:23, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Samajwadi Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151018225726/http://164.100.47.132/LssNew/Members/partywiselist.aspx to http://164.100.47.132/LssNew/Members/partywiselist.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:59, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
"Caste based"
editSomeone asked me on my talk page to take a look at the "caste based party" claim in this article. I said there in my reply that, from memory,
it began as a Yadav-centric party and so was definitely "caste-based" in the purest sense of the word. However, I think it now appeals to a wider range of people than just the Yadavs, meaning that it still gets involved in caste politics (like most Indian parties) but does not draw its support solely from one caste, nor frame its policies solely for one caste. It is OBCs, Dalits and the like now, rather than just Yadavs. Mulayam practically reinvented it to gain power.
I've just taken a quick look at the source cited here for the claim and it does indeed seem to suggest that it is no longer caste-based. Am I misreading it? - Sitush (talk) 14:39, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
Political position
editThe sources clearly suggests that it is a centrist political party which is left leaning on economic issues and right leaning on social issues, hence "Centre-right to centre- left" will be most appropriate, though I will like to hear your opinions too. Iamgreat4eva (talk) 10:15, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Yttriumshreww Iamgreat4eva (talk) 10:20, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
YttriumShrew Iamgreat4eva (talk) 10:23, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
"Controversies"
editWikipedia articles of major indian political parties (ex : Bharatiya Janata Party and Indian National Congress) does not have "Controversies" section in their page. To be fair to this page and to maintain the neutrality of wikipedia,"Controversies" section will be removed from this page. Sachin126 (talk) 04:09, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Adding to Sachin126, looks like various editors are pushing WP:POV in view of upcoming Assembly Elections in Uttar Pradesh. Please remember WP:NOTNEWS ChunnuBhai (talk) 05:11, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Criticism and controversies
editIn the realm of Indian politics, controversies arise on a daily basis. It's unnecessary to include every single daily controversy or news item unless the individual in question has been convicted by the Indian Judiciary or has served a considerable amount of time in jail. Also, Having a separate controversies section in articles isn't ideal. Instead, the pertinent issues should be addressed within the relevant sections of the individual's career articles, rather than consolidating them into a section that may incite negativity. Criticism and controversies section will be trimmed heavily in due time. Do no revert or engage in edit wars. I would request editors to discuss here on talk page before adding them. Thank you. Tcspower (talk) 07:27, 9 April 2024 (UTC)