Talk:Samalkota

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Vin09 in topic Requested move 09 July 2014

Split

edit

There has been no debate on the split tag. If the article is to be believed then the temple is separately notable. I note that the section is unreferenced, so splitting the article is taking a risk. I will take a chance. Op47 (talk) 17:30, 3 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 09 July 2014

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Samalkot remains unmoved Vin09 (talk) 14:58, 11 July 2014 (UTC)Reply



SamalkotaSamalkot – According to CENSUS INDIA the official name is Samalkot and Samalkota is a sub-district (mandal/tehsil), reference page see this. Vin09 (talk) 14:23, 9 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Survey

edit
Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
Mmm. You have a point. సామర్లకోట probably should be transliterated Samalkot. And the new romanization of Telugu below is rl ర్ల In ictu oculi (talk) 10:04, 11 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Discussion

edit
Any additional comments:

@In ictu oculi: But Census India shows Samalkota is a sub-district and the google search results shows it neither samalkot nor samalkota and a new name SAMARLAKOTA.--Vin09 (talk) 09:57, 11 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

@In ictu oculi: సామర్లకోట in telugu upon direct translation gives SAMARLAKOTA.--Vin09 (talk) 10:10, 11 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

@In ictu oculi: some proofs postal code, railway site, but I'm not able to stress more on this, as in Google maps it has samarlakota. I hope you are an expertise in wiki. Please decide an accurate name. I may have proposed the move, but let's wait for other users for some more info. Any comments?--Vin09 (talk) 14:09, 11 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Agree @LeoFrank: Superb! I support Google result decision of yours, I hereby withdraw my request.