This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
To begin, I suggest that this article focus on the history of attempts at Sanskrit revival in the past century or two as there is ample material for this time period. An examples of such material can be found both inside and outside of India. On October 1, 1874 the New York Times published an article on the revival of Sanskrit among Orientalist. See also, "THE AMERICAN ASIATIC AND SANSKRIT REVIVAL SOCIETY", that was established in 1894 and continued. I will continue to look for a more diverse group of sources. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 13:48, 14 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
