Talk:Sarah Hogg, Viscountess Hailsham
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
voice
editThat was definitely the problem and much commented upon at the time. And mentioned since in documentaries about C4 news, such as there have been. RuthieK 23:14, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Article location
editIs she actually using "Viscountess Hailsham"? Particularly as her husband doesn't seem to be using the Viscountcy. A lot of modern women with titles are opting to use the highest title they hold in their own right rather than a higher title derived from their marriage - e.g. Norma Major uses "Dame Norma Major" not "Norma, Lady Major".
One of the few other examples of a contemporary Baroness in her own right married to a higher title is Susan Cunliffe-Lister, Baroness Masham of Ilton where we have her there rather than at Susan Cunliffe-Lister, Countess of Swinton, whilst many a commoner woman married to a title has declined all styles - e.g. Beatrice Webb refused to use "Lady Passfield". Timrollpickering 10:52, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Some edits have been made by Syrri (talk), who claims to be Baroness Hogg's PA and states that she has made changes to the page because "this is her preferred wording." I have therefore added a note to Syrri's talk page, drawing her attention to a possible Possible Conflict of Interest.—GrahamSmith (talk) 03:24, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Sarah Hogg, Viscountess Hailsham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081212094207/http://www.parliament.uk/directories/house_of_lords_information_office/alphabetical_list_of_members.cfm to http://www.parliament.uk/directories/house_of_lords_information_office/alphabetical_list_of_members.cfm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110623182206/http://www.frc.org.uk/about/board.cfm to http://www.frc.org.uk/about/board.cfm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:03, 17 January 2018 (UTC)