Talk:Sarah Murnaghan lung transplant controversy
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Studies regarding high LAS scores
editThe information in this section isn't only relevant to Sarah Murnaghan's case. Therefore it probably doesn't belong in this article, but in the article on Lung allocation score. Maybe if related concerns about the validity of the LAS scoring system have been cited elsewhere in regard to Sarah Murnaghan, a reference to that fact could be included in this article.
Cleaning Up the Page
editA Wikipedia contributor, Breckham101 (talk · contribs), has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. This user's editing has included contributions to this article. Relevant guidelines include Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, Wikipedia:Autobiography, and Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. (COI declared here.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tidalvolumes (talk • contribs) 17:21, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
I took out the politico citation regarding the judge and the TRO because the judge himself stated that it was clear from the reporting that several journalists did not listen to the court audio. His official directive in granting the TRO should only be cited with his direct order, which is in his direct words. The judge repeating what the plaintiffs states is not his order. The entire order and follow up memo can be found here: http://www.pepperlaw.com/news.aspx?AnnouncementKey=1877 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tidalvolumes (talk • contribs) 17:30, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Blacklisted Links Found on Sarah Murnaghan lung transplant controversy
editCyberbot II has detected links on Sarah Murnaghan lung transplant controversy which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
- http://www.change.org/petitions/optn-unos-change-policy-to-allow-pediatric-transplants-of-adult-lungs-based-on-medical-necessity
- Triggered by
\bchange\.org\b
on the local blacklist
- Triggered by
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:08, 11 August 2015 (UTC)