Talk:Sasural Genda Phool

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Laranesight in topic Removed most of plot section

Usage and Grammar

edit

There are so many grammar and usage errors in this article it is unbelievable. Whoever has written this may need a good lesson in English 101.

Agreed - it may be better to just drop the mass amounts of (largely unverified) information on the characters rather than fix everything. Or at least all but the most central characters. — Tricolor Truce (talk) 03:35, 29 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Respective Ages

edit

Who came up with all of the ages for the characters in Sasural Genda Phool? Please, this is not a blog where one can have fun and be creative. Please stick to the facts and I honestly doubt you can find a reference for that.

File:Sasural Genda Phool.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Sasural Genda Phool.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:22, 22 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:SGPStarplus.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:SGPStarplus.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:SGPStarplus.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:07, 8 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://starplus.startv.in/characters.aspx?sid=19. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. —SpacemanSpiff 10:57, 19 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Removed most of plot section

edit

I began to copy edit this article but quickly realized it was incoherent and almost impossible to follow. Someone familiar with the show may want to provide a concise plot summary, but I doubt anyone could have rewritten the article using the information already provided. I believe it was best to start from scratch. Laranesight (talk) 17:26, 6 April 2016 (UTC)Reply