Talk:Sathyamangalam Tiger Reserve
 | Sathyamangalam Tiger Reserve has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 29, 2016. (Reviewed version). |
 | A fact from Sathyamangalam Tiger Reserve appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 January 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Importance
editI figure that any 145,530.92 hectares (562 sq mi) place in Tamil Nadu which is home to at least 46 tigers and 850 elephants is not of low importance.-Marcus334 (talk) 07:00, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
- Great work on the article. I was looking around for maps of the ranges as you asked. The br hills ranges map was based on the map that was made available on the India BIodiversity Portal, but they do not have a similar one for Sathyamangalam. I tried looking for any maps in publications, but couldnt find any. If you find any place where there is a map, I can then make a similar map, but presently, I dont know the demarcations between the ranges. prashanthns (talk) 03:22, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Prashanthns
- Recently published article at https://india.mongabay.com/2022/05/celebrating-tiger-numbers-in-sathyamangalam-tiger-reserve-while-tribal-residents-await-their-rights/ has the map of all ranges in both Sathyamangalam amd Hasanur forest divisions of of Sathyamangalam Tiger Reserve. 22mukil (talk) 04:39, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Change of page
editBetter to delete this article. Since the article with exact name Sathyamangalam Wildlife Sanctuary exists and this article has a spelling mistake of double ll.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prodrdt (talk • contribs) 17:31, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Protected Area
editWhile correcting a spelling error, I noticed that the article uses Template:Infobox settlement. This raised a question as to why the article is not headed by Template:Infobox protected area, since it is clearly reported as a 'protected area' in the first sentence. Am I missing something here? Woodlot (talk) 19:49, 27 June 2020 (UTC)