 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
To-do list
edit- Notable because: a prominent product (if not the most prominent) for coating self-made projection screens at this moment, summer 2006
- Note to myself: I have to supply links and evidence on this part quite fast, if I want to keep this stub ;)
- manufacturer: I am not starting a separate article on this. Maybe a few words on it in the product article
- marketing points: It claims to offer good image quality for low cost (well, doesn't all projection screen ads say just that)
- product details: advertised as thick acrylic paint with little filler.
- other: "Base coat" and a "Top coat" are needed to make a complete projection screen coating.
- critique: on many forums, DIY enthusiasts complain on the "banding" of the paint when applied to a surface, leaving visible stripes on the finished screen.
- anti-critique: the official saying and the reports of many consumers tell that the effect of "banding" tends to lessen with about 3-4 weeks time
- anti-anti-critique: some reports tell that the stripes don't always disappear with time, as advertised.
- performance: many reviews can be summed up to form this section of the article.
Well that's about it.. Now I have to find time to turn this to-do list into great prose and a wonderful (stub) article. Santtus 14:16, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Oh and one thing. As a seasoned wikipedian I'm afraid that the article might be in risk to be speedily deleted - in such a case, please have the courtesy to move this talk page section to my personal talk page, so I can work later to improve the content. Thank you. Santtus 14:19, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Confirm prominence
editI've looked around and I'll confirm that this seems to be the most prominent product in this space. I could only find two others: DIY theatre, and Project X Paint --Risacher 18:42, 4 December 2006 (UTC)