Talk:Second Chance (body armor)
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of Second Chance (body armor) be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. Wikipedians in the United States may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Providing ballistic vests to the Bavarian and North Rhine-Westphalia State Police
editAnyone interested in this subject?
My first suggestion: "More than 30,000 Second Chance Ballistic vests were delivered by Second Chance Body Armor GmbH to provide police officers of the Bavarian State Police and the North Rhine-Westphalia Police around 2000. About five years later, Second Chance officials said, that their ballistic vests do not provide 100 % protection after a certain amount of time. That lead to think the two police forces about a new manufacturer and to replace Second chance products. (The Bavarian Police is now provided with body armor made by Mehler Vario System [1], Second Chance products have been replaced)." Millions of tax money was wasted because the German branch went bancrupt and there was no refund possible."
There are many sources[2] [3] [4] but all in German, I'm afraid.
August 2015
editExternal links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Second Chance (body armor). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060806200121/http://officer.com/article/article.jsp?siteSection=6&id=24498 to http://www.officer.com/article/article.jsp?siteSection=6&id=24498
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061213145406/http://www.policeone.com/police-products/tactical/body-armor/press-releases/93763/ to http://www.policeone.com/police-products/tactical/body-armor/press-releases/93763/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:03, 16 January 2018 (UTC)