 | Selina Meyer has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: January 1, 2014. (Reviewed version). |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Selina Meyer article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | A fact from Selina Meyer appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 January 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Selina Meyer/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 11:36, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Nominator: TonyTheTiger(T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD)
Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have my full review up shortly. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 11:36, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- Pass
- B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
- Pass
- C. No original research:
- Pass
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- Pass
- B. Focused:
- Pass
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Pass
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- Pass
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Pass
- B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- Pass
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass.
- Pass or Fail:
- Fix section Personal life (MOS:PARAGRAPHS). The number of single-sentence paragraphs should be minimized. Short paragraphs and single sentences generally do not warrant their own subheading. Either this section should be merged into the previous section, or else more information on the character's personal life should be added.
- Rearranged.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 00:28, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- Puffery (WP:PEA)
- Use a different heading for section Critical acclaim. Many FAs on fictional characters refer to "Reception" or "Critical reception", which would be more neutral.
- done.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 00:29, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- Use a different heading for section Critical acclaim. Many FAs on fictional characters refer to "Reception" or "Critical reception", which would be more neutral.
- Synonyms for said (WP:SAY)
- Fix "Parker further notes that". What follows is his interpretation, so a verb like "assesses" or "opines".
- O.K.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 00:31, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- Fix "Laura Bennett of The New Republic notes". This is really an opinion.
- Fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 00:34, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- Fix "Parker further notes that". What follows is his interpretation, so a verb like "assesses" or "opines".
I'm putting the article on hold. All the best! --Seabuckthorn ♥ 23:10, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
OK, everything looks good now. Passing the article to GA status. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 11:49, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Merger proposal
editIn April 2017, an editor created a new page called List of Veep characters, which is actually an unfinished version of a different Selina Meyer article. I'm going to propose merging that article into this one, and I'll ask the editor who created that page what they think. -- Danny (talk) 21:23, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect List of Veep characters to here without merging. That page is a long-standing unfinished unreferenced orphan best treated with WP:TNT; redirecting as an alternative to deletion. Klbrain (talk) 20:46, 25 October 2018 (UTC)