Talk:Selvaraghavan

Plot??

I don't see the need for the plot of '7G Rainbow Colony' in this article about Selvaraghavan. --Madhu 13:11, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

removed now, don't wait for others :-) --M.arunprasad 06:59, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

This article uses lots of subjective judgement, including statements like: "Selvaraghavan is one of the India's emerging prolific film director whose roots are from the southern part of India",: The intention is not to dispute that he is an accomplished director. The fact is that the statements above are entirely subjective. They should be reworded as something like : "selvaraghavan is an emerging film director in the Tamil movie industry, widely appreciated for his ...."

"His directorial skills were appreciated by most of the India's leading directors and people concerning cinema.": Well, you can't say that 'coz you haven't really talked to each of India's leading directors, have you? It should be reworded as "His directorial skills have drawn apprecation from several promininent directors including X, Y, z". And you must provide citations here.

"The best compliments he has received are from the Press and from Bharathiraja who said of Kaadhal Kondein that "After Nayagan, it's the best film I've seen":- Again, we can't judge that. Simply state that "Veteran movie dir Bharathiraja is said to have remarked on "kK" that "After Nygn...."

"He has worked on his characters so well that you forget that they are stars and you can identify with them easily": really? thats what all good movies do. This statement has no merit. Instead you can state that:

His movies are characterised by their strong dialogues, casting and real-life screenplay.." blah blah blah..

Orphaned references in Selvaraghavan

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Selvaraghavan's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "rediffreview":

• From Karthi: Srinivasan, Pavithra (19 April 2010). "Aayirathil Oruvan is not for the faint hearted". Rediff. rediff.com. Retrieved 14 January 2010.
• From Kamal Haasan: Vijayasarathy, R G (2008). "Dasavathaaram is spectacular". Rediff.com. Retrieved 13 June 2008.
• From Aayirathil Oruvan (2010 film): Srinivasan, Pavithra (2010). "Aayirathil Oruvan is not for the faint hearted". Rediff. Archived from the original on 16 January 2010. Retrieved 2010-01-14. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 12:11, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Selvaraghavan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.hindustantimes.com/news-feed/entertainment/i-m-commitment-shy-viveik-oberoi/article1-322598.aspx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140213004954/http://vmovies.in/tollywood-news/50-crores-loss-one-flop to http://vmovies.in/tollywood-news/50-crores-loss-one-flop

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:47, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Date of Birth

No idea Captaincc7 (talk) 15:54, 21 January 2021 (UTC)