| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Seoul article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 90 days  |
 | This  level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
Climate
editMarch 25.1C new record on 22 March https://www.ogimet.com/cgi-bin/gsynres?ind=47108&decoded=yes&ndays=2&ano=2023&mes=03&day=22&hora=15
Sources
editBiggest issue is sources. Grammar and formatting is easy to fix. Please feel free to delete unsourced stuff if you can replace it with your own sourced writing.
Please don't add anymore unsourced writing; article has too much already toobigtokale (talk) 22:26, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- Please, these issues still need solving people :( toobigtokale (talk) 14:15, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
- Still outstanding... Maybe in 6 months I can try to take this up, but fr it's depressing to be one of the only people tackling major issues on Korea-related articles. toobigtokale (talk) 22:31, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Same with Korean military articles. Still having problems with lack of sources. Cheer up Gasiseda (talk) 20:47, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Everything about Korea on Wikipedia that isn't about war or pop culture is in a sorry state. These kinds of articles that appeal to general audiences need a lot of attention that they're not getting. toobigtokale (talk) 08:20, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- Your words cannot be truer. If only all those Koreans at the Liancourt Rocks and Sea of Japan talk page had interest in editing other articles related to Korean history... A handful of editors like you and User:Koreanidentity10000 are the only ones who manage such pages. 00101984hjw (talk) 04:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Everything about Korea on Wikipedia that isn't about war or pop culture is in a sorry state. These kinds of articles that appeal to general audiences need a lot of attention that they're not getting. toobigtokale (talk) 08:20, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- Same with Korean military articles. Still having problems with lack of sources. Cheer up Gasiseda (talk) 20:47, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Still outstanding... Maybe in 6 months I can try to take this up, but fr it's depressing to be one of the only people tackling major issues on Korea-related articles. toobigtokale (talk) 22:31, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Improvement
editThe article is thankfully slowly improving. It is still unsourced in some portions and missing a chunk of info, but hopeful that we'll get there. 104.232.119.107 (talk) 16:30, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 1 May 2024
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
It should be eq York first as it has overtaken Japan. 64.189.18.37 (talk) 17:41, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. --Ferien (talk) 20:18, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Toponymy section
editI wrote this in an edit comment, but the toponymy section is pretty poor. "Repetitive, MOS:REPEATLINK, repetitive non-English text (we don't need the same hanja/hangul every single time a word is mentioned, just need it the first time). Also lot of unsourced info in unencyclopedic WP:TONE"
Needs a thorough scrubbing, should probably be largely scrapped and rewritten in more unified prose. seefooddiet (talk) 20:17, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- I made some edits on the repetitive info issue. Are there any specific statements that need sourcing? 00101984hjw (talk) 04:10, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- All unsourced statements should be sourced. seefooddiet (talk) 05:26, 18 August 2024 (UTC)