System map

edit

It would be nice to see that included in this article. --Bolonium 18:15, 25 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:KSRcaplogo.jpg

edit
 

Image:KSRcaplogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:00, 16 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Serbia DOES NOT have a direct railway connection with Albania, since the only railway that connected Albania with former Yugoslavia was the Podgorica - Skadar railroad, and now, Montenegro is an independent country. Another incorrect statement in this article is that Zeleznice Srbije is the only railway operator; as far as I know, there are three more railway operators in Serbia, a private company Kombinovani Prevoz, RTB Bor and the Nikola Tesla thermal power plant, and these two companies operate their own rolling stock. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.30.189.90 (talk) 13:59, 28 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Should I include a table about the rolling stock traction units? Alek serb (talk) 23:50, 12 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Rolling Stock

edit

CAn I include a table on rolling stock traction units? Alek serb (talk) 23:51, 12 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Map

edit
 

We definitelly need a map. This is the only one I found, and in my view is better than nothing.

Other pics

edit
 
Belgrade´s Vukov spomenik station
 
Interior of a ŽS passanger wagon.

Also, some other picks were removed. For instance, this two images (interior of a passanger wagon, or the Vukov Spomenik station) are much more illustrative of the modern day Serbian railways than the old locomotives which are repeated in other pictures. FkpCascais (talk) 03:39, 22 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Serbian Railways. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:04, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:37, 15 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:39, 18 October 2022 (UTC)Reply