Talk:Serbophilia

Sources needed

The section with links to people needs to have a source next to each person supporting why they are/were Serbophiles. Without sources we cannot retain their names in this list. Elizium23 (talk) 12:46, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

The sources provided are woefully inadequate. Novosti.rs referenced for the American actors is an opinion piece. WP:OPINION applies. YouTube channels are not reliable sources unless verified. Wordpress blogs are not reliable sources. Elizium23 (talk) 01:49, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Some of those are okay, but basically I agree, a number of sources and names should be removed. @Igornotter: Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 12:47, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

scribd.com is a file host and not a reliable source. Also, the lede paragraph's grammar is wrong: Serbophilia is an adjective, but it's being treated as a noun. Elizium23 (talk) 23:41, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Per MOS:FLAGICON we are unable to accept flag icons in the text of the article. Elizium23 (talk) 01:24, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

smell of bad faith?

Hi, I'm a Charles Catcher subscriber and I like how he comments about related serbs. And I decided to research and I entered in this article. I noticed some extreme and meaningless changes, trying to deny people who are interested, I noticed an edition in bad faith. I saw that a lot of information has valid and notable references. It is the first time that I will edit. I will restore the information, remove those that contain conflicting information and remove those that mention youtube links, thanks for reading Mariovespucio (talk) 04:49, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Something smells, that's for certain. Let's see...Pipsally (talk) 06:12, 8 February 2021 (UTC) Blocked sock:Orchomen.

Restorations of stock edits

It seems possible that some of these could be restored with better sourcing, but many look tenuous at best. Pipsally (talk) 16:02, 5 April 2021 (UTC) Blocked sock:Orchomen.

Yeah, that is right. Jingiby (talk) 16:30, 5 April 2021 (UTC)