Talk:Serbs of Bosnia and Herzegovina
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Antifascism
editI have changed the part of the article which in a total inversion of history described both the Partisans and the Chetniks as antifascist factions. The particular sentence had no source, but I want to highlight the problem of historical revisionism that the Balkan topic area faces. Bibliography doesn't discuss the Chetniks, a faction which committed widespread ethnic cleansing and collaborated with Nazi Germany as antifascists in any way, shape or form. --Maleschreiber (talk) 00:34, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- Should we then say Partisans were not anti fascists because they killed more people then Chetniks in ethnically motivated war crimes? First battle between rebels and nazis after the capitulation of Kingdom Of Yugoslavia was in Bijeljina which is in current Bosnia and Herzegovina. You are just anti-serbian and thus you want to hide good things about Chetniks. That makes you fascist. 178.221.90.191 (talk) 18:05, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:23, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:23, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Anti-Serbian hysteria (Serbs are not intruders in Bosnia)
editAs I noticed in many articles in English Wikipedia about Serbs, Serbia, Serbian history etc, anti-Serbian sentiment and hysteria is strong and prevails. Statement that "Serb settlement was initially in modern-day southwestern Serbia" in History\Kingdom of Serbia part of the article is clear example of anti-Serbian hysteria and comes from an article which title suggests it is not about history of Serbs. Serbs settled medieval Bosnia same time as they settled other areas of Balkans. Serbs are thus not intruders. That part should be left out as it is trying to falsely portrait Serbs as intruders in Bosnia. That is very problematic statement\idea and it is one of the causes of ongoing ethnic conflict in Bosnia. No historical source claims that Raska are was initial part where Serbs settled. That idea stems from the fact that most significant Serbian medieval state originates from Raska aristocracy. Please leave that out somehow, thanks. It is insulting to me as a Serb to see such a statement. 178.221.90.191 (talk) 18:19, 28 June 2024 (UTC)