Talk:Serpentine soil

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mpatter3.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 09:00, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Asbestos

Should someone speak of the relationship between serpentine and asbestos —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.19.235.227 (talk) 01:34, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Don't know, is there one?Apothecia (talk) 03:12, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Yes: Chrysotile asbestos is a serpentine mineral (see the first three paragraphs of Serpentine group), and I believe it's found in many ultramafic deposits. Wildbirdz (talk) 22:34, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Merge serp. barrens into

Going to merge serpentine barrens into this page, so here is the notice: merge content from Serpentine barrens

Apothecia (talk) 03:12, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

US bias

This article is entirely US-based. There are serpentine rocks in other parts of the world, eg Lizard Peninsula, UK. see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geology_of_Lizard —Preceding unsigned comment added by BioImages2000 (talk • contribs) 09:01, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

---

can someone add at the begining a simple definition, i still dont understand what is a serpentine soil or why it is special —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.172.61.32 (talk) 18:45, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Serpentine soil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121108150822/http://www.dnr.state.md.us/publiclands/central/soldiersdelight.asp to http://www.dnr.state.md.us/publiclands/central/soldiersdelight.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090222203402/http://www.lancasterconservancy.org/property_rocksprings.htm to http://lancasterconservancy.org/property_rocksprings.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:26, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Route to C-Class

This article has a lot of good information, and there are plenty of sources on this topic. It is well-studied enough to have a good article. What it needs most is to be cleaned up and reorganized--if we can do that, we can get it to C-class without a hitch.

I have started this process, working from the top down, and I have identified some specific issues:

1. The references list needs to be properly organized

2. We need images of the actual soil, preferably a soil profile. The current image is more ecological in nature.

3. There are many places where information is duplicated or segmented awkwardly into different headings. Some of this should be reorganized.

4. There are stub headings which have very little information, but which would be better to flesh out than to delete.

5. As others have noted, this article is highly US-centric and other areas should be better represented. The Lizard, for example, should be represented much better as it is the namesake of Lizardite. I will be cross-linking this specific example but there are other examples of outcrops.

6. The botany section is quite extensive, which is good, but it outweighs some other aspects of the topic. Let's bring the rest of the content up to this size rather than decreasing the content here.

Here are some sources to use: [1], [2], [3], [4]. In general, there should be some really good sources from universities in the California area. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prometheus720 (talk • contribs) 22:03, 9 April 2019 (UTC)