Talk:Sexual Harassment (The Office)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleSexual Harassment (The Office) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starSexual Harassment (The Office) is part of the The Office (American season 2) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 8, 2008Good article nomineeListed
January 11, 2013Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Untitled

edit

What is the "Pam's mom rule" mentioned in the article? Oh, I bet it's "Let's just act every day like Pam's mom is coming in" from 8:40 into the episode.

Fair use rationale for Image:TheOffice(US)2-02.jpg

edit
 

Image:TheOffice(US)2-02.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:02, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Sexual Harassment (The Office)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Looking good. Only a few suggestions:

  • Unbold quotes around episode title.
Done --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 14:43, 7 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
  • he realizes that he's not in trouble, that the lawyer's job is to protect him -- avoid contractions and use "he is"; also maybe there should be an "and" after the comma?
Done --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 14:43, 7 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
  • asks in whispers (shushed by an embarrassed Pam) which one is Jim -- which what is Jim?
Done --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 14:43, 7 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
  • Michael stops Todd Packer when he tries to share another inappropriate joke -- reads kind of oddly to have Todd's surname when none of the other characters have a surname upon second mention.
    • In Production he's also referred to as just Packer. Whichever you think is best, just refer to his as "Todd" or "Packer" after his first mention.
Done --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 14:43, 7 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
  • Having both worked in office environments prior to filming The Office -- italicise the show title; and do we need to link office?
  • Corvette currently links to a type of warship -- perhaps you mean Chevrolet Corvette? :)
Done --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 14:43, 7 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
Done --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 14:59, 7 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
  • Again (I think I addressed this in a previous Office review), per WP:MOSTV#Reception polls to the general public are considered unreliable and shouldn't be included, i.e. the OfficeTally.com poll.
Removed --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 14:59, 7 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
  • Image:TheOffice(US)2-02.jpg isn't low resolution and should be scaled down; also, is there a better image we could use? The situation with Jim isn't mentioned in the plot so obviously wasn't a really pivotal part of the episode.
How about now? --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 14:59, 7 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

That's about it :) Good luck with the changes, the article's on hold for a week. —97198 talk 07:00, 6 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Awesome. Only one little thing outstanding (he iss not in trouble) but that's easily fixed and I'm happy to promote to GA status in the meantime. —97198 talk 06:23, 8 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sexual Harassment (The Office). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:32, 28 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sexual Harassment (The Office). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:34, 19 June 2017 (UTC)Reply