Talk:Sexual Harassment (The Office)/GA1

GA Review

Looking good. Only a few suggestions:

• Unbold quotes around episode title.

Done --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 14:43, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

• he realizes that he's not in trouble, that the lawyer's job is to protect him -- avoid contractions and use "he is"; also maybe there should be an "and" after the comma?

Done --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 14:43, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

• asks in whispers (shushed by an embarrassed Pam) which one is Jim -- which what is Jim?

Done --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 14:43, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

• Michael stops Todd Packer when he tries to share another inappropriate joke -- reads kind of oddly to have Todd's surname when none of the other characters have a surname upon second mention.
  • In Production he's also referred to as just Packer. Whichever you think is best, just refer to his as "Todd" or "Packer" after his first mention.

Done --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 14:43, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

• Having both worked in office environments prior to filming The Office -- italicise the show title; and do we need to link office?
• Corvette currently links to a type of warship -- perhaps you mean Chevrolet Corvette? :)

Done --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 14:43, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

• You can link Television Without Pity.

Done --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 14:59, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

• Again (I think I addressed this in a previous Office review), per WP:MOSTV#Reception polls to the general public are considered unreliable and shouldn't be included, i.e. the OfficeTally.com poll.

Removed --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 14:59, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

• Image:TheOffice(US)2-02.jpg isn't low resolution and should be scaled down; also, is there a better image we could use? The situation with Jim isn't mentioned in the plot so obviously wasn't a really pivotal part of the episode.

How about now? --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 14:59, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

That's about it :) Good luck with the changes, the article's on hold for a week. —97198 talk 07:00, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Awesome. Only one little thing outstanding (he iss not in trouble) but that's easily fixed and I'm happy to promote to GA status in the meantime. —97198 talk 06:23, 8 August 2008 (UTC)