Talk:Shake (software)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by THX1136 in topic Cites needed??

Untitled

edit

This page reads as a commercial for shake; can someone make it less glowing?

Fair use rationale for Image:Shake 4.png

edit
 

Image:Shake 4.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:29, 18 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Shake and Snow Leopard

edit

Even though its discontinued, does Shake still run on the latest OS? --70.167.58.6 (talk) 00:46, 14 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

You can check at http://www.apple.com/support/shake/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jdtyler (talkcontribs) 18:18, 14 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Shake 4 ist PPC based. So it will definitely not run on 10.7 Lion.

92.228.8.207 (talk) 10:55, 16 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

This is 10.7 (and now 10.8) incompatibility confirmed by anyone? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.211.194.116 (talk) 10:45, 27 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Shake (software). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:29, 12 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Cites needed??

edit

To preface, I've been watching the Lord of the Rings trilogy again. I mention this as that's what brought me to this article. In the end credits Shake is mentioned as being used in the film. I had not heard of Shake so I decided to see what I could find out which lead me here. In light of that I don't know how to use this film credit as a source for the claim that Shake was indeed used in the making of the LOTR. It seems to smack of OR which I understand is not accepted, but I know without doubt Shake is in the film credits. I've done some editing here and know of no way to use film credits for a cite. Indeed, it may not be possible to do so. Could someone offer help on this issue? Thanks! THX1136 (talk) 23:28, 4 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decided to take the time and find a cite. THX1136 (talk) 02:59, 5 November 2018 (UTC)Reply