Talk:Shamlaji

India: Gujarat / Geography Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Gujarat (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Villages (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Villages, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.VillagesWikipedia:WikiProject VillagesTemplate:WikiProject VillagesVillages articles

Hinduism Mid‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Splitting the article

Latest comment: 11 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hello @Redtigerxyz, I saw you put a tag up on this page in 2021. I do want to ask what your reasons are for this suggestion before I offer my opinion Chilicave (talk) 04:53, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Chilicave, the Shamlaji temple is a notable WP:N temple and deserves its own separate article, while this article can focus on the place of Shamlaji as a town.--Redtigerxyz ^Talk 06:53, 9 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Redtigerxyz, I could not find any reliable sources about the Shamlaji temple outside of the one's mentioned in the article. When looking at WP:N, there is no fixed number of sources required since sources vary in quality and depth of coverage, but multiple sources are generally expected. I'm not sure we have enough sources to be able to split off this entire section into a new article, unless you are able to find some sources. Chilicave (talk) 03:50, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic