 | Sharad Panday has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: October 23, 2017. (Reviewed version). |
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
 | A fact from Sharad Panday appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 October 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Formatting
editResearch papers should be in quotes; books are in italics. Yoninah (talk) 21:51, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Sharad Panday/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Adityavagarwal (talk · contribs) 08:33, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
Glad to pick it up for a review! :) Adityavagarwal (talk) 18:33, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Is there any particular reason of having citations in lead?
Done Have removed citations from lead.
- "pioneers" and "pioneered" slightly puffy. :P
- Done Have re-worded "pioneers" and "pioneered"
- If it is Don Bosco High School, Matunga, you could link Don Bosco High School.
- Done Have linked Don Bosco High School.
- Could you add when he received the "Ontario Heart Foundation fellowship"?
- Done Have added the year he received the fellowship.
- "The hospital was one of the very few places in India where heart surgery was performed, and thus Panday performed hundreds of open heart surgeries" why is the "and thus" part here? Are the two parts of the sentences linked somehow?
- "was chief" if there was only one chief position, you could fix it to "was the chief".
- Done Have added the chief.
- Link Nanavati hospital.
- I think Nanavati hospital is linked.
- We could have the publications as a list.
Looks good to me, and this is all I have to say! Adityavagarwal (talk) 18:33, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Have tried to address most of it. Please do let me know if its adequate. Thank you FITINDIA 19:13, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Fitindia Just two more comments left. The list and a tweaking thing. If you have any difficulty, ask me, I could do them for you!
- Adityavagarwal, have done the list could you please help me with the tweak. Thank you 19:24, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Fitindia One last thing I would say is to add citations to publications, as every bit of information has to be supported by sources (reliable)! Adityavagarwal (talk) 20:00, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Adityavagarwal Done Please do have a look. Thank you FITINDIA 20:10, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Short but interesting article, good to go! Adityavagarwal (talk) 20:14, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Adityavagarwal
- Fitindia One last thing I would say is to add citations to publications, as every bit of information has to be supported by sources (reliable)! Adityavagarwal (talk) 20:00, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Adityavagarwal, have done the list could you please help me with the tweak. Thank you 19:24, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Fitindia Just two more comments left. The list and a tweaking thing. If you have any difficulty, ask me, I could do them for you!
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
