Talk:Sharadindu Bandyopadhyay
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Aseleste in topic Requested move 13 February 2021
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sharadindu Bandyopadhyay article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
Discussions:
|
Requested move 13 February 2021
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Not moved. By this point, the weak consensus to not move is strong enough for a close considering the twice relisting and long open duration of the request. (non-admin closure) ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 13:35, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Sharadindu Bandyopadhyay → Saradindu Bandyopadhyay – Clear scholarly consensus [1], [2], [3], [4], [5],[6], [7] 157.40.185.87 (talk) 14:52, 13 February 2021 (UTC)—Relisting. -- Calidum 04:59, 8 March 2021 (UTC) —Relisting. —Nnadigoodluck███ 07:18, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Leaning oppose. My brief search gets more Google hits and Google News hits for the current spelling. BD2412 T 03:25, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- @BD2412 I don't know whether Wikipedia has any specific term for that, but I do think what you've encountered is result of some circular effect, which is to say that most Indian publications just blindly copy-pasted the spelling from the Wikipedia page throughout the years. The researcher here has in fact met Bandyopadhyay multiple times and the subject of that scholarly paper is no one else but Bandyopadhyay himself. So I don't really see why Hatcher himself would't get the spelling of his subject's name right. 157.40.243.39 (talk) 08:46, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- We call it citogenesis, and it is indeed seen as a problem by some. But in cases such as this, any proposed solution is worse than the disease. The fact that Wikipedia may have influenced the common name is irrelevant; That is unprovable and in any case the damage is done. Andrewa (talk) 09:01, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose. Nom appears to think that primary sources should take precedence. In fact it's the opposite; They have little relevance. So we should go with BD2412's searches. Andrewa (talk) 09:01, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.