Talk:Sharon den Adel

Mezzo-soprano voice

Oh my dear!, she has not a mezzo-soprano voice, do you get it? I mean, stop editing the page, writing that. Do you know what's a mezzos-soprano voice, anyway? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.22.132.219 (talk) 08:25, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Ummm...yes I do. You obviously do not. Tribal44 (talk) 17:12, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Tribal44To me she absolutely sounds like a light lyric soprano (kind of soubrette - very light voice instead of typical "thik" and deep mezzo sound). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.163.199.60 (talk • contribs)

However, we need a reference with that information. Someone may think she sounds like a light soprano, a mezzo, or something completely different. -- ReyBrujo (talk) 00:00, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

It's just the vocal range... I don't know it from head but every-thing above a certain note is Mezzo-Soprano... has nothing to do with singing style, just how high pitched.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajakhr (talk • contribs) 03:31, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

she must be a mezzo-soprano, she can go low notes in "the Howling" but can go high in "the promise" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.71.223.251 (talk) 14:21, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Her voice type clearly suits to soprano, not a mezzo (think about Jane Doe, Angels for eq.). She can go that low using her chest voice. For further informations search voice types and please stop modifying it to mezzo all the time. (SkyBlueBumper (talk) 17:52, 25 September 2009 (UTC))

She's both she sings in soprana even whistle register (Jane Doe, What have you done and a lot more songs) but she can also be very deep with her voice like in The heart of Everything. So she suits in all three vocal ranges like mariah Carey does! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.0.139.12 (talk) 10:19, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Mezzo-soprano is a sub-type of Soprano. Hence, she must be listed as a Soprano, also provided that she is not using any particular classical technique. In popular singing both mezzo-sopranos and sopranos are considered sopranos, although voice types have extremely insignificant role when it comes to contemporary singing. So, don't you think it's wise to cut the ignorant discussion on voice types? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.86.82.106 (talk) 23:23, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

She Is Mezzo Like Simone simmons She Have a Nice and Great Voice Without Be Soprano!!! is something Like Some People Insist that Fredrie Mercury Was Tenor But He Was a True Baritone The Song "Ensueño" Is The Fact And Counter-Tenor Are The Baritones and Tenor That Can Do a Great Falsetist Voice!!! Like Freddie Mercury a Falsetist By Excelence!!!

In Some Comment of Articles Sound like that be to underestimate the Mezzo-Sopranos haron "has sings in the mezzo-soprano range but her vocal quality is light and lyric despite her range." [redact] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.32.138.229 (talk) 16:44, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Yeah uhm instead of keeping arguing about her soprano/mezzo soprano voice, you might wanna focus on more relevant stuff, like changing her birthday to the actual date: 12 July 1974..... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.171.6.55 (talk) 22:18, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

At this point, the assertion that she sings in the mezzo-soprano range is backed up by three cited sources: the Within Temptation official web site, IMDb, and an independent reviewer. Unless anyone is able to produce references to reliable sources stating to the contrary, I will consider the matter resolved. Wilhelm Meis (☎ Diskuss | ✍ Beiträge) 00:02, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Vegetarian?

One of the categories at the bottom of the page indicates that den Adel is a vegetarian. While I think that this is cool (if it's true), I cannot find supporting evidence for the claim. Am I missing something? —Kanodin (talk to me / slap me) 11:14, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

I deleted this category. It was a simple misconception: according to http://www.sharondenadel.net/information/trivia/ Sharon "is a vegetarian. She doesn’t eat red meat and only once a week she eats white meat like chicken or fish." This does not make any sense: vegetarianism is a practice of not eating any kind of meat. Therefore she can't qualify not even as a pesco-vegetarian. --Sigurdas (talk) 03:47, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

In other words she's probably best described as a flexitarian, which is so wide open to interpretation and dispute there should never be a category for it. DrFishcake (talk) 10:08, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

This information was added again (by OmegaXmutantX), who also put it in the article the last time. I deleted it. Philbert^2.71828 18:40, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Using the talk page

Before posting to this or any other article's talk page, please have a quick look over WP:TALK to see how to use the talk page more effectively. I understand most of the folks posting here are not very experienced with editing Wikipedia, and we all struggle at first to learn the rules and the customs, but there are some useful tips that would help facilitate more productive discussion here. Let's start with signing your posts using four tildes (it will look like this: ~~~~) after your comments. Wilhelm Meis (☎ Diskuss | ✍ Beiträge) 23:55, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Lead section

Please take a look at MOS:LEAD before making further edits to the lead section. The lead should summarize the article, so facts mentioned in the lead SHOULD be mentioned elsewhere in the article. Because something is included later in the article is NOT a reason for deleting it from the lead section. If we were to delete everything from the lead section that is mentioned elsewhere, there wouldn't be anything left. Think about it. Wilhelm Meis (☎ Diskuss | ✍ Beiträge) 00:57, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Sharon den Adel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120604115641/http://www.within-temptation.com/band-members/sharon-den-adel/ to http://www.within-temptation.com/band-members/sharon-den-adel/
• Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6HM5SJCmI?url=http://www.within-temptation.com/about-wt/ to http://www.within-temptation.com/about-wt/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090608041436/http://www.within-temptation.com/en/index.php?c=news&command=show_item&id=131 to http://www.within-temptation.com/en/index.php?c=news&command=show_item&id=131
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927010824/http://www.roadrunnerrecords.co.uk/asktheartist/index.aspx?askID=80 to http://www.roadrunnerrecords.co.uk/asktheartist/index.aspx?askID=80
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120604115641/http://www.within-temptation.com/band-members/sharon-den-adel/ to http://www.within-temptation.com/band-members/sharon-den-adel/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:55, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Sharon den Adel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090724141011/http://www.within-temptation.com/en/index.php?c=news&command=show_item&id=144 to http://www.within-temptation.com/en/index.php?c=news&command=show_item&id=144
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070822111604/http://www.fye.com/Within-Temptation_stcVVcatId480281VVviewcat.htm to http://www.fye.com/Within-Temptation_stcVVcatId480281VVviewcat.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:09, 14 December 2017 (UTC)