Talk:Sheena, Queen of the Jungle

Latest comment: 1 year ago by BoomboxTestarossa in topic Eclipse?

Reason for deleting wikidate overlinkage

edit

It's per Wikipedia style guidelines. This from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_%28dates_and_numbers%29#Avoid_overlinking_dates

Avoid overlinking dates
If the date does not contain a day and a month, date preferences will not work, and square brackets will not respond to your readers' auto-formatting preferences. So unless there is a special relevance of the date link, there is no need to link it. This is an important point: simple months, years, decades and centuries should only be linked if there is a strong reason for doing so. Make only links relevant to the context for the reasons that it's usually undesirable to insert low-value chronological links.
Usage of links for date preferences
  • year only. So 1974 → 1974. Generally, do not link unless they will clearly help the reader to understand the topic.
  • month only. So April → April. Generally, do not link
  • century. So 20th century → 20th century. Generally, do not link
  • decade. So 1970s → 1970s. Generally, do not link (Including an apostrophe [1970's] is incorrect)
  • year and month. So April 1974 → April 1974 Generally, do not link
  • new year and month. So April 2000 → April 2000 Generally, do not link unless they will clearly help the reader to understand the topic. Presently, articles only exist for combinations from the year 2000 to current
  • day of the week (with or without other date elements). So Tuesday → Tuesday. Generally, do not link.--Tenebrae 21:55, 24 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Eclipse?

edit

"the latter reprinted by Eclipse Comics as Sheena 3-D (January 1985) and by Blackthorne Publishing as Sheena 3-D Special (May 1985)"

I can't find any evidence the Eclipse comic came out; it's not listed at GCD or in Amazing Heroes #158 (which has a full list of Eclipse's 3-D titles) and the only Google results loop back to this article one way or another. Adding in that Blackthorne apparently printed the same material four months later makes no sense I would theorise that the title was announced for Eclipse and then for whatever reason went to Blackthorne. Therefore I'm removing the Eclipse stuff from the article until more can be verified. BoomboxTestarossa (talk) 09:52, 7 April 2023 (UTC)Reply