Talk:Shelley Archer

Shelley Archer is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 25, 2007	Featured article candidate	Not promoted

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Women C‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Australia: Western Australia / Politics Low‑importance

	Australia portal Shelley Archer is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Start Class

Latest comment: 17 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

I have assessed this article as start class for WP:AUS. Until the article gets some section headings. Once that is done im sure the article would meet B-class standard. If you have any problems with this rating, please contact me via my talk page. Thanks Twenty Years 12:36, 14 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Infobox would also be another nescessity if it was going to become B-Class. Good luck. Twenty Years 12:37, 14 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Well its now a featured article candidate. Unfortunately i dont think it will pass. Here are some of my suggestions for improving the article to get it to FA:

Picture of the person
Break into sections - which will then need expanding.
Fix the references, reference marks next to eachother looks ugly IMO and in other FA's (eg. Hamersley, Western Australia) they have combined the refs to make only one tag, but still have the same refs (quite good)

Hope this helps a bit. I have decided to keep the rating as Start-class. If someone else (without a COI) wants to assess it, theyre more than welcome to. To be fair, its a border-line case - but i am not willing to let my reputation slip because i am going to bend the WP standards. Good luck. If you have any questions regarding my proposed improvements for the article - feel free to leave a message on my talk page. thanks. Twenty Years 13:06, 14 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

B-Class

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Opinion has changed. Good luck in the future with it. Twenty Years 13:14, 14 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Add topic