Talk:Sherilyn Fenn

Comment by Daydream believer2

This is possibly the most POV article I've ever read (well that might be a bit of an exaggeration!), so I'm revamping it considerably. Daydream believer2 08:26, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

POV of section Slowdown in her career

Any artist who is not getting work blames the system for being money-obsessed. Actors from every genre rise with their talent all of the time and fresh faces are just as important as star power in entertainment. Perhaps Fenn's story is different, but with only bitter and dismissive quotes from her, it's a lot more likely that this section is either biased or the editor failed to read or cite any other sources other than interviews with Fenn. If there are sources that give further evidence that she was ignored, that would really help the POV, if their are sources that give another story, that would make a much more interesting (and truthful) read. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.42.216.138 (talk) 07:18, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Oh! And this lack of work due to artistic integrity also overlaps perfectly when the indie film scene exploded.

Lead

Good work in improving the article so far. The lead needs to be expanded to properly summarize the article. The article uses too many fair-use images as well, I think. Best wishes Hekerui (talk) 11:51, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Too much detail

Does anyone else think the 'career' section of this article is a bit too detailed? It should be a summary of her career, not listing every role she's ever had - that's what the table below is for. Robofish (talk) 21:23, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Sherilyn Fenn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110713163016/http://www.knbc.com/news/14155661/detail.html to http://www.knbc.com/news/14155661/detail.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:27, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Sherilyn Fenn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060620190703/http://mjsimpson.co.uk/interviews/sherilynfenn.html to http://mjsimpson.co.uk/interviews/sherilynfenn.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060620190703/http://mjsimpson.co.uk/interviews/sherilynfenn.html to http://mjsimpson.co.uk/interviews/sherilynfenn.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110713212434/http://www.lionsgateinfo.com/epk/feb09/ to http://www.lionsgateinfo.com/epk/feb09/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:25, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

House burned down, started Gofundme

I don't know if it's significant for the article, but apparently her house has burned down, and now she's started a Godfundme because she needs money: [1]. I could directly link to the Gofundme, but I'm afraid it could get deleted as spamming. --2003:EF:13C6:FE59:D0D:D67A:1C20:969 (talk) 21:23, 20 March 2019 (UTC)