Talk:Sherwood Forest
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sherwood Forest article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Victorian Era
editWhat's with the sentence that begins "Victorian era"? It just doesn't make sense.24.176.136.25 (talk) 14:40, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
I agree. A previous editor deleted the first part of this paragraph. The remaining part did not make sense. I have undone this change. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.93.153.113 (talk) 04:14, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
hey people what are you doing ?? I sat infront of the pc !!
I think this would benefit from a section outlining what Sherwood Forest was in the middle ages as a royal forest. I've done something like this at Feckenham Forest.Jim Killock (talk) 21:18, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
History?
editCan't we have a bit of history? 86.183.121.186 (talk) 01:22, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Sherwood Forest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110727170304/http://www.pastscape.org/hob.aspx?hob_id=1461548&search=all&criteria=thynghowe to http://www.pastscape.org/hob.aspx?hob_id=1461548&search=all&criteria=thynghowe
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928061133/http://www.thelivinglegend.co.uk/ to http://www.thelivinglegend.co.uk/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100422121530/http://www.visitnotts.com/ to http://www.visitnotts.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:31, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Team-B-Vital Improvement Drive
editHello all!
This article has been chosen as this week's effort for WP:Discord's #team-b-vital channel, a collaborate effort to bring Vital articles up to a B class if possible, similar to WP:Articles for Improvement. This effort will run for up to seven days, ending early if the article is felt to be at B-class or impossible to further improve. Articles are chosen by a quick vote among interested chatters, with the goal of working together on interesting Vital articles that need improving.
Thank you! -- ferret (talk) 00:04, 4 November 2021 (UTC)