The article has too much of 'PR' feel to it.

edit

There is just too much lauding, quoting and crediting and almost entirely positive; little factual or historical information. Overall prose, somehow, feels like a press write up. Just wanted to ask some senior people if the article is all right and is it me who is being harsh before editing the content.


There's a wrongly attributed quote in the last paragraph of the Choreography section

edit

Pretty sure the quote attributed to John Travolta is simply a massive mis-read of the linked article. The author of the article is stating that she enjoyed the dancing and that she thinks Travolta did as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:B8F8:8900:2080:164F:CF2A:CDDC (talk) 20:05, 31 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

I have removed the entire paragraph. The source is way too ambiguous for anything that it said other than, perhaps, that Davar choreographed something at that particular event. - Sitush (talk) 10:28, 12 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Date of birth is needed.--109.252.195.255 (talk) 06:09, 12 December 2020 (UTC)Reply