Talk:Shinsengumi

Latest comment: 5 months ago by 89.139.215.226 in topic Name

Tone

edit

Could someone tone down the overdramatic aspects of this article? The influence of certain fictionalized accounts of the Shinsengumi is a little strong... 221.254.245.147 01:32, 25 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Just a little note, the Chinese (simplified) version has a copyright infringement notice on it...

--Jasper Chua 10:30, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Perhaps someone can add a link (and possibly a short description) of the movie based on the Shinsengumi?

Mibu gishi den When The Last Sword Is Drawn (2003) http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0359692/maindetails

Maybe someone can add that Hijikata Toshizo and Kondo Isami were the founders of the Shinsengumi. Roseice8 (talk) 22:45, 27 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Adding to sonno joi, maybe include the other political opinions that divided the country at this time. Roseice8 (talk) 22:45, 27 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

For the three factions under "Historical Facts", perhaps the layout would be better if it were written not as a numbered list, but in paragraph format, adding extra information about each faction. Roseice8 (talk) 22:45, 27 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Name

edit

Shinsengumi was never called "Wolves of Mibu", this seems to be a Manga invention. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.134.172.24 (talk) 17:16, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

they was called wolves of mibu they was 89.139.215.226 (talk) 11:40, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply


Depictions in media Section

edit

I'm thinking this section might fare better if it breaks off of the current page, as it doesn't relate directly under the Shinsengumi's history. At least then there shouldn't be any big disputes about if the entry is historically accurate or not. I'd like to know what you guys think. (Gantou (talk) 01:39, 13 August 2009 (UTC))Reply

The word sect

edit

Is the word sect properly used in the article? This word has a strong religious meaning which sounds inappropriate here. alx-pl D 00:16, 12 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

The word "sect" has been changed to "faction". Also, the last sentence of the introduction has been cleaned up.
Crotchviolence 03:14, 15 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

RK anime

edit

Scenes from the Ikedaya are NOT shown in the RK anime (see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ikedaya_Jiken). Also, since the Shinsengumi WAS a police force, saying that Saito's post-Shinsengumi job was in the Japanese police is like saying that Saito's post-police job was in the police. Seven13:24, 8 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Picture

edit

"Mannequins dressed in Shinsengumi outfits" The mannequins are wearing "Happi" not "Haori". The Shinsengumi Happi is popular souvenir for foreigners in Kyoto and not accurate historical outfit of Shinsengumi. They wore "Haori" not "Happi" --Hskf4 08:09, 27 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Gintama

edit

Please stop adding Gintama to "Depictions in Media."

Gintama's setting is years after the Shinsengumi's era and members of the Shinsengumi aren't in it at all! The characters are very loosely based on the Shinsengumi members but featuring characters based on the Shinsengumi members in the series is not featuring the Shinsengumi members. Such info should be added to the Gintama articles.

Again, the section is "Depictions in Media", not "Shinsengumi Inspired Works." Seven 06:51, 15 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

I wouldn't say that Gintama is a Shinsengumi inspired work instead I would say it features a reimagined Shinsengumi. Kondo, Okita and Saitoh were all members of the real life Shinsengumi and these three are the most prominent Shinsengumi characters in Gintama I think you should seriously give that some thought--Bushido Brown 21:02, 30 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
Even according to the official information, Gintama is a Shinsengumi inspired work and Gintama's Kondo, Okita and Hijikata were only named after the actual members of the real life Shinsengumi. (Again, they are very loosely based on the Shinsengumi members.)
This isn't about what I think. Encyclopedic content must be verifiable by a published reliable source. Seven 23:26, 30 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image

edit

I don't know about anyone else, but I think the main image at the top of the article looks silly. Is there nothing better we can use? Maybe just move an image of one of the statues up? LordAmeth 10:02, 27 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

The image at top is factually incorrect version of the haori. Traditionally mountain stripes were only on the sleeves, not the base. Moden day recreations by some indivisuls put the mountains on bottom. Another picture that is factually correct should replace it.Jinnai (talk) 16:15, 5 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Peacemaker Kurogane

edit

Shouldn't someone mention Peacemaker Kurogane in the media section? The Shinsengumi was pretty much the focal point of the plot and heavily dealt with them on a detailed level. RyoRiazaku (talk) 06:30, 2 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Modern times

edit

Apparently , up to 1945 there was a special police corps also called Shinsengumi . Whether this was the official name or some sort of nickname will have to be established . Here are two occurrences of this Shinsengumi :

1/at http://www.aikidojournal.com/article?articleID=125 , Kishomaru Ueshiba recalls his father in 1942 :

At that time there was a police chief named Kenji Tomita and through this connection my father was invited as a martial arts instructor to teach a group which was similar to the present riot police called the “Shinsengumi.”

2/at http://www.hiranuma.org/english/index_essay.html Takeo Hiranuma has :

When the guard and I came to the front of the neighboring house burned in the air raid, we saw a group of about thirty policemen named SHINSEN-GUMI, who were surrounded by soldiers with machine guns

Hoping someone would have more precise info and would edit them !Logglog (talk) 22:18, 9 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Shinsengumi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:24, 11 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Color

edit

the Article claims, that the Shinsengumi would have had asagi-iro, an actually **greenish** blue. However, the source cited does **not** include that color - in fact all it says about color and pattern is "Blue and white uniforms". Can someone provide a better source? --89.15.238.3 (talk) 10:34, 17 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ryu ga Gotoku: Ishin Remake

edit

Does the section covering the focus on the Shinsengumi in RGG: Ishin deserve mention of the 2023 remake? Is there a style guide for handling video game remakes in other articles? Zetagaming (talk) 23:44, 8 December 2023 (UTC)Reply