Talk:Shurasena

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Sam Sailor in topic Copyright problem removed

Merger Request

edit

This article is about a mythical king. Little is known about him, besides, it is also misleding. Surasena are mentioned in Rigveda too but not as a person rather as a tribe from which is supposedly tribe Yadu evolves. It is considered more likely to be an extension of Surabhira. Ikon No-Blast 16:04, 16 November 2010 (UTC) here Merger doesn't make sense this article is about a figure mentioned in a text of historian like Tod in reference to well known figures like Porus, Krishna, etc. Quote provided in the article. Your theory is wrong. He was a descendant of Yadu. Aticle no where states that he was the founder of Yadu tribe as alleged. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.42.208.185 (talk) 16:24, 19 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Another reference to Surasena as person, rather than a tribe:

Surasena was a Yadava. One of his descendants could, therefore, call himself a Yadava or a Surasena as he liked..." Chauhān Dynasties: A Study of Chauhān Political History, Chauhān Political Institutions, and Life in the Chauhān Dominions, from 800 to 1316 A.D., By Dasharatha Sharma, pp 103, Published by Motilal Banarsidass, 1975--129.42.208.185 (talk) 16:32, 19 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

  Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://sainiworld.com/MWebsite/A0ImpPageDisplay.aspx?MyProgramID=92. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Sam Sailor 15:24, 24 June 2021 (UTC)Reply