Talk:Sicklefin lemon shark

Copyright problem removed

This article was based on the corresponding article at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, neither of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you. --Geronimo20 (talk) 06:47, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Sicklefin lemon shark/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hi Yzx, another excellent shark article! Just a few comments/questions before I pass it:

• "...suggest that there is little exchange between regional subpopulations." Not sure exchange is the best word here

• Changed to "intermingling".

• consider linking or explaining symphysis so that the reader doesn't end up thinking that it's a fancy synonym for center

• Changed.

• "The fins (especially the dorsal, pectoral, and pelvics) of the sicklefin lemon shark are more falcate..." falcate?

• Added definition.

• "This shark seldom undertakes long movements." Maybe specify "long distance"

• Changed to "long-distance movements".

• aside: I never knew there was such as thing as a guitarfish. Cool!

• They are; it's unfortunate that rays don't receive nearly as much scientific attention as sharks.

• "...ovulation and mating for non-pregnant females..." Is it necessary to specify non-pregnant? Do pregnant females ovulate and mate?

• Because the reproductive cycle is biennual, in any given year half the females are pregnant (or have just given birth) and don't mate, and the other half are non-pregnant and mate.

• any info on lifespan?

• Not that I'm aware.

• the max known length is given, but how about the typical length? Is is similar for males and females?

• Amended.

I've addressed the points; let me know of any others. -- Yzx (talk) 00:46, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

Prose is clear and concise; article complies with MOS.

1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c(OR):

   Ample reliable sources.

2. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Coverage is comparable to other GA-quality shark articles.

3. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

4. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

5. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   All images have appropriate free use licenses.

6. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Nice work. Sasata (talk) 01:01, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

More nonsense statements

"Significant levels of genetic differentiation between sicklefin lemon sharks in Australia and French Polynesia, 750 km (470 mi) apart, suggest that there is little intermingling between regional subpopulations.[4]"

This statement is nonsense. Do they mean, 7500 kilometres (4700 miles) between Australia and Tahiti perhaps ?Eregli bob (talk) 21:25, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Added URL to reference which was used to support this statement. Original statement (in abstract of paper) is "...populations in Australia and French Polynesia, separated by oceanic distances of at least 750 km, are moderately differentiated...". I agree paraphrased statement should be improved but haven't done so myself. -IGTaylor (talk) 22:22, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sicklefin lemon shark. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140627094911/http://www.iucnredlist.org/ to http://www.iucnredlist.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:08, 2 July 2016 (UTC)