Talk:Sicklefin lemon shark/GA1

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Sasata in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Hi Yzx, another excellent shark article! Just a few comments/questions before I pass it:

  • "...suggest that there is little exchange between regional subpopulations." Not sure exchange is the best word here
  • Changed to "intermingling".
  • consider linking or explaining symphysis so that the reader doesn't end up thinking that it's a fancy synonym for center
  • Changed.
  • "The fins (especially the dorsal, pectoral, and pelvics) of the sicklefin lemon shark are more falcate..." falcate?
  • Added definition.
  • "This shark seldom undertakes long movements." Maybe specify "long distance"
  • Changed to "long-distance movements".
  • aside: I never knew there was such as thing as a guitarfish. Cool!
  • They are; it's unfortunate that rays don't receive nearly as much scientific attention as sharks.
  • "...ovulation and mating for non-pregnant females..." Is it necessary to specify non-pregnant? Do pregnant females ovulate and mate?
  • Because the reproductive cycle is biennual, in any given year half the females are pregnant (or have just given birth) and don't mate, and the other half are non-pregnant and mate.
  • any info on lifespan?
  • Not that I'm aware.
  • the max known length is given, but how about the typical length? Is is similar for males and females?
  • Amended.

I've addressed the points; let me know of any others. -- Yzx (talk) 00:46, 31 August 2009 (UTC)Reply


GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
Prose is clear and concise; article complies with MOS.
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):  c(OR):  
    Ample reliable sources.
  2. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    Coverage is comparable to other GA-quality shark articles.
  3. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  4. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  5. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
    All images have appropriate free use licenses.
  6. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Nice work. Sasata (talk) 01:01, 31 August 2009 (UTC)Reply