Talk:Silver-throated tanager
Latest comment: 2 years ago by FunkMonk in topic GA Review
![]() | Silver-throated tanager has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: December 9, 2021. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Silver-throated tanager/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: FunkMonk (talk · contribs) 16:48, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Might as well have a look at this bird too. FunkMonk (talk) 16:48, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Any cladogram?
- Added.
- Have you looked at Google Scholar for additional sources? Looks a bit skimpy now.
- Checked Scholar, found a bit on parasites, but nothing else new.
- "The silver-throated tanager was first described as Calliste icterocephala by Charles Lucien Bonaparte in 1851" But when was it moved to its current genus and by who?
- Added some info, but couldn't find a ref specifying who synonymized it and when (although I'm thinking it's Gray for Calliste being lumped into Calospiza).
- Link Tangara at first mention.
- Done.
- Link species group.
- Done.
- "This placement is supported by mitochondrial DNA evidence.[6]" Conducted by who and when?
- Added.
- Add a caption for the map.
- Done.
- The two profile photos are very similar, how about using one that shows the bird from a different angle too? Front, back, flying, etc. For example:[1][2]
- Changed.
- Colour of the beak, eyes and feet?
- Added.
- "April–September, during when" During which?
- I think when is correct, though I'm not sure.
- "Females are the only one" Ones?
- Fixed.
- "species of passerine bird in the tanager family Thraupidae." Should also be stated in the article body.
- Done.
- "along with tall secondary forests, along with disturbed habitat" The double "along with" is repetitive.
- Reworded.
- Anything on courtship behaviour?
- Nope.
- That should be all for now, AryKun. FunkMonk (talk) 01:42, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- FunkMonk, I think I've addressed all your concerns. AryKun (talk) 12:15, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
- Alright, changes look good, I wish there was more info, but you can't add stuff that doesn't exist. So I'll promote it now. FunkMonk (talk) 12:52, 9 December 2021 (UTC)