Talk:Sinemia

Latest comment: 2 years ago by King keudo in topic Copyedit


Copyvio issues

edit

@Diannaa: Can you delete the recent versions? They copy directly from sources such as businessinsider. D4iNa4 (talk) 15:59, 28 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Distuption

edit

There seems to be some disruptive editing going on regarding recent events on this company. Please discuss these point on this Talk Page. Otherwise, we will seek to protect the page and prevent IP/new editing from making changes. thanks. Britishfinance (talk) 12:33, 13 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Single sided editing should be out of question, I think publishing articles based on personal opinion should not happen.Calling something "bad" depends on the person and the definiton "bad" is subjective.

About publishing an article

edit

Isnt it necessary to leave out personal or public assumptions when editing a Wikipedia page if a credible source is not present?

User: Arikkokmerih

edit

You need to explain properly why you are deleting sections of this article. In one of your deletions, you said that Sinemia was not shutting down and that it was just from a Business Insider article, however, I have found similar articles on USA Today Bye, bye Sinemia: MoviePass competitor calls it quits, abruptly shuts down US operation, and others? Your actions, therefore, make you look like a disruptive editor which is why your edits are being reverted. If you continue, you will get blocked and the article will get protected so that only experienced editors can edit on it. However, if this article is misleading, we can address that too. You need to specifically state the issues with this article so that we can check them. Britishfinance (talk) 15:33, 14 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Just list them out here and start each issue with a separate bullet (type in "*" at start), and when finished sign your posts by typing in "Britishfinance (talk) 15:35, 14 May 2019 (UTC)". Britishfinance (talk) 15:35, 14 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Unauthentic Content

edit

@Diannaa: and @Britishfinance: This info is wrong and it should be removed as per Wikipedia policy. It is degrading a person entity. WP: LIBEL and WP:POV "An April 25, 2019 Change.org petition calls for lawmakers to "Arrest Sinemia CEO Rifat Oguz for Theft & Fraud Against the American Moviegoer." (Soodanlalita (talk) 15:01, 23 May 2019 (UTC))Reply

I have removed this sentence in the lede of the article as I could not find any sourcing for it. Britishfinance (talk) 16:28, 28 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 28 May 2019

edit

In USA, able to browse https://www.sinemia.com/new-plans and enroll for plans. I believe this action would be a waste of money for users since there won't be any response from Sinemia 72.84.249.230 (talk) 14:20, 28 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

What are you requesting that is specifically changed (if anything) to the article? thanks. Britishfinance (talk) 14:36, 28 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
  Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Sam Sailor 15:12, 29 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 28 May 2019

edit

Soodanlalita (talk) 16:09, 28 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

See above, have removed this sentance as it had no sourcing. Britishfinance (talk) 16:29, 28 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Copyedit

edit

Changed the sentence "...thus leaving many compelled to provide their personal identification documents as unusual and invasive as the demand is." to "thus leaving many compelled to provide their personal identification documents despite how unusual and invasive the demand was."

Looking to fix the tense issues with this sentence. However, this line almost feels opinionated; "unusual and invasive". I didn't see anyone specifically calling out as invasive in the refs, but I may have missed it. King keudo (talk) 22:37, 6 July 2022 (UTC)Reply