File:Stankovic Inter.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Stankovic Inter.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Other speedy deletions
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:29, 9 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Actually, none of the names in this section are really popular in Russia, except Lyubov, Nadezhda, Svetlana, and Vera for girls, Boris and Vladimir for boys. Most of those names could have been popular about ten or eight centuries ago. (Vsevolod and all names ending on -slav, except very antique Iziaslav, still live, but they are rather rare).

Here is the link about top names chosen for the newborns: http://deti.mail.ru/roditeljam/samye_populyarnye_imena_novorozhdennyh_v_moskve_sofiya_i_aleksandr/. As of 2012, the most popular female names are Sofia, Maria, Anastasia, Anna and Daria, and the most popular male names are Alexander, Artem, Maxim, Ivan and Dmitry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.25.58.33 (talk) 19:01, 14 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Needs a bit of formatting

edit

The section on single-lexeme names needs to be re-formatted so that it can fit next to the infobox. As it is, it is causing a big gap in the middle of the article. I don't know how to do this. Leschnei (talk) 22:45, 17 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Many names given folk etymology

edit

By clicking on many of the names one can find a more proper explanation (which usually traces back to PIE and is thus at least somewhat convincing since people actually put some academical research behind that). Many of the explanations listed in this article are folk etymologies. Ahyangyi (talk) 14:15, 31 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

saints

edit

The table of saints is a mess, containing many hidden fields (mostly about patronage), and it's unclear what belongs with what. I'll try to clean it up but will probably get some things wrong. —Tamfang (talk) 17:45, 8 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:05, 26 October 2020 (UTC)Reply