Talk:Small hive beetle

Latest comment: 7 months ago by Alexiathia in topic Citations

Mode of movement

edit

There's no indication how the beetle gets from location A to location B. Can they fly? I don't know the answer to this, and I was sort of expecting to find it in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcwren (talkcontribs) 00:36, 2 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Untitled

edit

"If you discover or suspect that any of your hives has an infestation of small hive beetles, contact a Virginia apiary inspector."

This doesn't seem to belong in this article. Just seems a bit too specific. It's like saying in an article about robbery to "Contact the 14th Precinct."

Its no more there

edit

You are right and it seems to be edited by someone -maybe you. There's no such sentence anymore.Neophyrigian (talk) 09:06, 6 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Virginia Tech Source

edit

The link for the source "The Small Hive Beetle Department of Entomology, Virginia Tech, June 1999, accessed Sep 2005" is no more valid. It can be accessed via archive.org: http://web.archive.org/web/20070314153020/http://www.ento.vt.edu/~fell/apiculture/hivebeetle/ I'm not sure how to edit in such situation, so I'm leaving it to be edited by a more experienced friend. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neophyrigian (talkcontribs) 08:59, 6 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

absence vs. presence

edit

Shouldn't

Its absence can also be a marker in the diagnosis

be

Its presence can also be a marker in the diagnosis

just from a logical standpoint?

edit

Under the Sub-Section "Distribution", we have the below four sentences; two References are given, the first which isn't even a proper Wiki reference by any stretch of the imagination and the second appears to be a dead link. There is a citation request going back to 2017! So, without any proper References being provided, these unsourced sentences need to be removed; I'll wait for a short while to wait for feedback, and then hopefully wiki standard references.

The movement of migratory beekeepers from Florida may have transported the beetle to other states. Recent findings also indicate transport of the beetles in packages.[citation needed][1] In Canada, the small hive beetle has been detected in Manitoba (2002 and 2006), Alberta (2006), Québec (2008, 2009), Ontario (2010), British Columbia (2015), and New Brunswick (2017). In the Prairie Provinces, measures were taken to control the pest, and small hive beetles failed to establish a population. It is still to be determined whether the small hive beetle has been able to establish a resident population in Ontario or Québec.[2]
  1. ^ Mark Welsch, Beekeeper and member of the Omaha Bee Club added Iowa and Nebraska from personal observation and discussions with other beekeepers.
  2. ^ "Small Hive Beetle". Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. 4 August 2017. Retrieved 2012-05-22.

Bibby (talk) 21:40, 12 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Citation needed for the italian situation

edit

"Since 2015 the beetle is present in Southern Italy (Calabria and Sicily) and some areas have been quarantined" Here is a citation, straight from the italian ministry of health website. https://www.salute.gov.it/portale/sanitaAnimale/dettaglioContenutiSanitaAnimale.jsp?lingua=italiano&id=258&tab=2 79.11.109.71 (talk) 12:22, 13 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: Behavioral Ecology 2024

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 January 2024 and 25 April 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Chri Ye (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Angelina2024.

— Assignment last updated by Angelina2024 (talk) 01:23, 21 March 2024 (UTC) Chri Ye (talk) 22:31, 29 February 2024 (UTC)I added detailed description about the food resources, physical description, and other important behaviors of small hive beetles. The original life history section was deleted because the information only focused on the physical appearance of the beetle during its different life stages. I sorted these information and wrote a new Description section. The Life History was rewritten and it included a more comprehensive view about the growth of the beetle. Other sections were not edited. All information was found in scientific research papers and well referencedReply

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by BlueMoonset talk 02:58, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

5x expanded by Chri Ye (talk). Self-nominated at 01:50, 1 March 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Small hive beetle; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.Reply

  •   While the article has more than doubled in size, preexisting articles must be expanded fivefold within seven days of the start of the expansion, which is far from the case here: from 6969 prose characters to 15944 prose characters is not sufficient, and the required 34945 prose characters is out of reach. Thank you for your interest in DYK; I'm sorry it didn't work out this time. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:27, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Peer Review

edit

Hello, I am leaving a peer review on your article! I think that this article is very interesting and was enjoyable to read. It does a good job of covering a wide variety of topics! I made some edits to your article as well. Throughout the article, I noticed some minor grammatical errors, so I fixed those. There was also a spot that mentioned that peppermint extract or candy could be used to control the beetle in the control section. This was not backed up with a source, so I added a citation needed marker. There are also several other citation needed markers from other editors that I would suggest resolving. I also added more information in the control section. Particularly, I added information about how fungi could be used as a form of biocontrol. Angelina2024 (talk) 03:04, 21 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Additionally, I added several links to various terms throughout the article that readers could click so they could find more information about them. Angelina2024 (talk) 03:13, 21 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Peer review

edit

This article is well-written and has a lot of interesting information under each of the sections. There are pieces of information that are missing citations (citation needed markers), so I would make sure to add the references. I also suggest expanding on the Migration and Enemies sections. For example, adding an explanation as to why the beetles prefer long distance flights or information about any defenses they might have against predators will elevate these sections. I also moved the information under the Regulation section to the Distribution section because it was information about the distribution of the beetle in Australia. Cvj.005 (talk) 23:22, 21 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Citations

edit

This was a very well-written article, with a lot of information and good organization. I added references and citations to the Distribution section for the beetle being found in the Philippines, Life history for the information about South Africa, and Control for information about peppermint oil. The page had citations needed markers for most of this information. I could not find a source stating that the life cycle information we know are primarily from studies in South Africa. There are still many places throughout the page where citations are still needed. Alexiathia (talk) 04:54, 22 March 2024 (UTC)Reply