Talk:Smart House

Disney Low‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comedy

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

https://www.theringer.com/movies/2019/6/19/18686827/smart-house-disney-artificial-intelligence-katey-sagal

Copy vio

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I think this might be a copy vio because of the quote "... to defeat a very smart house." I'm pretty sure that I've heard that actual line used by Disney. I might be wrong though -anabus_maximus (Talk to me) 23:16, 10 November 2006 (UTC) She is the best ever!Reply

smart houses

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

uh... shouldn't there be an article about actual smart houses, not just a movie? shouldn't this be renamed smart houses(movie) and a new article be written about the integrated technology style of construction? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.160.252.223 (talk) 01:01, 4 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 21 November 2019

Latest comment: 4 years ago5 comments5 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved as proposed, per consensus. (non-admin closure) – Ammarpad (talk) 07:20, 30 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Smart House (film) → Smart House – Per WP:DIFFCAPS. This is the primary topic for "Smart House" (uppercase proper noun), as opposed to the lowercase smart house. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 09:02, 21 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Comment pageviews Note that Smart house is a redirect to Home automation whose only mainspace wikilinks are a hatnote from Smart House (film) and a use in the plot summary of I.T. (film). Smart House is a dab page not linked from anywhere in article space (so it should be a pretty accurate measure of how often readers are typing "Smart House" into the search bar). Colin M (talk) 05:28, 22 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
Support per nom and above comment. The film is only topic using Smart House. Station1 (talk) 08:06, 22 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
Support per primary topic/primary redirect reasoning. There's no reason to disambiguate this, when the only other competing claimant is a minor-phrase redirect to some other topic. The IoT sense isn't an encyclopedia topic itself, but a related term of one (i.e., one's smart house is the result of one's home automation, the latter of which is the properly encyclopedic scope). And the IoT sense is actually declining in currency, from what I can tell, because it sounds silly and is an eyeroll-worthy buzzword that's been spammed in early IoT marketing to the extent that it turns people off. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 18:27, 29 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic