Talk:Smith special counsel investigation
 | A news item involving Smith special counsel investigation was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 10 June 2023. |  |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
redirect from Jack Smith special counsel investigation > Smith special counsel investigation
editCan anyone create a redirect from Jack Smith special counsel investigation to this current article? I couldn't see how to make the uncontroversial request etc. Cheers! 98.155.8.5 (talk) 01:45, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Done soibangla (talk) 02:02, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks!! 98.155.8.5 (talk) 04:09, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
it's here soibangla (talk) 23:48, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
- I redirected it here rather than WP:CSD#A3. We don't necessarily need a new article, we can wait and see how it goes. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:55, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
- I went ahead and added language in the lede and to the June section about the indictment. I am super inexperienced with ledes, so feel free to rewrite it or expand on it as much as necessary. I would also suggest protecting it, given this page will probably get a lot of visits soon. --Delukiel (talk) 23:59, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
- Lead edit seems fine to me. Pages are not protected preemptively. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:02, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
- Ok, sounds good! Edit: I actually went ahead and deleted my edit to leave in Soibangla's, since theirs is more detailed. Delukiel (talk) 00:04, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
- Lead edit seems fine to me. Pages are not protected preemptively. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:02, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
fake electors
editthere are increasing indications that Smith is also investigating Trump fake electors plot, contrary to what our lead says. not quite sure what to do about that yet. ideas? soibangla (talk) 00:10, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- I've considered the fake electors plot to be a portion of the January 6 situation/investigation, as the ploy in Congress was to use the fake elector slates to create enough doubt to delay certification. I don't know that we need to make any changes. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:25, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
docs winding down, J6 winding up
editsince the indictment, it appears Smith has now pivoted to J6, which might require us to move some furniture around in here. ideas? soibangla (talk) 17:40, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
This article is more like a Journal (story), than an encyclopedic article
editThis article really need to be tidied up into an encyclopedic article. Right now it reads more like a timeline of events, and it has no clear summary of the investigation or key points. Most of the headings are dates! Guinness2702 (talk) 15:54, 18 January 2024 (UTC)