Talk:Snow White (2025 film)

Rachel Zegler is being reduced in the movie

According to this YouTube user, she is being reduced and the movie will show more the younger version to "soften". Source:[1] 190.21.186.226 (talk) 23:28, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

A random YouTube video cannot be used as a reliable source. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 23:31, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

What about this video? Source:[2] 190.21.186.226 (talk) 23:36, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

While there are some minor exceptions, you're best off if you just assume all YouTube videos are unusable. Cheers. Dumuzid (talk) 23:49, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

There are more source here:[3]https://thatparkplace.com/exclusive-rachel-zegler-rumored-to-have-reduced-role-in-upcoming-disney-snow-white-live-action-remake/ [4]https://www.sportskeeda.com/pop-culture/rumor-rachel-zegler-s-screentime-snow-white-cut-drastically-insider-leaks-suggest [5]https://www.sportskeeda.com/pop-culture/rumor-rachel-zegler-s-screentime-snow-white-cut-drastically-insider-leaks-suggest 190.21.167.172 (talk) 05:40, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

None of those strike me as a reliable source by Wikipedia standards. If you think I am wrong, you can certainly seek other opinions at the reliable sources noticeboard, but I would be firmly opposed to citing any of those, especially as they all are based on rumors and suggestion by their own terms. Cheers. Dumuzid (talk) 06:02, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Anything coming out of the rumor mill is unreliable, and most likely fabricated. See WP:FILMRS for a list of reliable sources about film. But I'll save you the trouble for this case: there are no reliable sources that confirm this made-up story. InfiniteNexus (talk) 17:37, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

These items can be added to the controversy section for now as long as they clearly state the information is still rumored and cited with several, not one or two, sources. Since the movie has not come out yet, this article can entirely be cast in the light that the movie direction can change at any time and any rumors can become reality, likewise, any supposed concrete facts can be later revealed to never have had a part in the production. You can expect this article to be fully rewritten once the movie is actually published along with "behind the scenes" documentaries.69.167.196.62 (talk) 18:14, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

We don't include baseless WP:RUMORS on Wikipedia just because some random people on the internet make claims up. Trailblazer101 (talk) 18:46, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

There is also speculation saying that she will be replaced in the main role and that Disney wants to cast Lucy Hale. Sources:[6] [7] [8] 201.188.133.126 (talk) 01:12, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

One more time for the people in the back row: YOUTUBE. IS. WORTHLESS. ON. WIKIPEDIA. Cheers. Dumuzid (talk) 01:51, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

It's not just YouTube. Some of the proposed sources have the word "rumored" in their headlines. If they feel the need to make it clear that it is idle chit chat in the headline then it takes some cast iron chutzpah to propose it for use as a source in an encyclopaedia. DanielRigal (talk) 19:16, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Weren't some of those Youtubers like Mike Zeroh confirmed to be just making things up out of the ether? If so, then no wonder why Wikipedia doesn't use random Youtubers as reliable sources. It'd be one thing if Mike Zeroh was shown speaking to these individuals, but he never is, we're just expected to listen and believe when he says something. 198.163.159.103 (talk) 18:58, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Film may have been cancelled

Accrording to this source. Is it reliable? Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 09:17, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

No. It’s a fan site blog. Mike Allen 12:55, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

No, in fact this source should be blacklisted for presenting information as if it were true. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 16:56, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

You need to read the article, not the clickbait headline that doesn't reflect it. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:13, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 26 August 2024

It should be Walt’s Disneys animated film not disneys animated film so I’d like to edit that bit of the page if that’s okay not to sound rude Polywog701 (talk) 23:13, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

 Not done The production credit in the 1937 film itself is "A Walt Disney Feature Production" but I think Disney's animated film is a reasonable short form description for it. I don't think it needs changing as the 1937 film is linked for more into on it. Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:09, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Slight issue with that is all the ones that are based on the animated films that Walt Disney produced are credited as based on Walt Disney’s animated film I.e dumbo, Cinderella, the jungle book etc so I think it’s because you think it’s reasonable I think it’s cos you’re lazy and you hate others being right but that’s on you anyway have a good one Polywog701 (talk) 09:50, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Read about WP:OTHERCONTENT. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 ^{[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]} 10:53, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

When Walt Disney is used by itself it generally refers to the person, not the company. Disney by itself refers to his company. The company Walt Disney Productions made the film. For the purposes of this article, in the context of this article about the 2025 Disney film, and solely to identify the 1937 film "Disney" by itself is sufficient and correct. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:22, 27 August 2024 (UTC)