 | A fact from Songjiang Square Pagoda appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 December 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
So
editok--Drt drt boy (talk) 21:29, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
- No, not ok. You need to actually look around for the thing's COMMON ENGLISH NAME, not just dump a ridiculous amount of untranslated and unexplained Chinese citations into a machine-translated stub. "New China" isn't a thing in English. At the very least, redirects were in order from the thing's more common names. — LlywelynII 05:30, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Moved
editTo Songjiang Square Pagoda, since that seems to be the thing's most common English name per cursory Google Books searching. There are a minimal number of translations, though, so, if there's an official English name from the district government or culture ministry, we should use that. — LlywelynII 06:03, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Sources for future article expansion
editThe Chinese-language citation spam mentioned above is commented out here:
Kindly restore it to the article as it is explained and used to cite specific points in the text. — LlywelynII 05:45, 19 November 2016 (UTC)