Template:Did you know nominations/Songjiang Square Pagoda
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 23:29, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Songjiang Square Pagoda
edit
- ... that Songjiang's Square Pagoda is the centerpiece of Fangta Park, one of the first reassertions of traditional Chinese architecture after the Cultural Revolution?
- ALT1:... that Songjiang's 9-story Square Pagoda retains its Northern Song style despite nearly a millennium of repairs and restorations?
- ALT2:... that Songjiang's 9-story Square Pagoda is a relic of the time when it was the largest city in the Shanghai region?
- ALT3:... that the reliquary of the 11th-century Buddhist monk Miaoyuan was rediscovered in 1975 during repairs to Songjiang's Square Pagoda?
- Reviewed:
Will doWeight plate - Comment: Don't worry: You only need to check the sources for the hook(s) you like.
- Reviewed:
Created/expanded by LlywelynII (talk). Self-nominated at 07:45, 19 November 2016 (UTC).
Definitely long enough, good hooks, and reliable references
I'm sorry. It was very kind of you to come by and look at the article, but the lack of a chosen hook and a signature (Add ~~~~ after your posts) points to the very slapdash quality of this review, which should not qualify for QPQ purposes. You actually have to go down the list (copyvio check, met 5x, image status, &c.) and show some homework. — LlywelynII 07:44, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- Article length clearly meets requirements, and has been expanded over 5x within the last few days. Article is neutral and cites reliable sources in both English and Chinese, however Citation 2 links to an error page. No copyvio or plagiarism concerns. Hooks are interesting, although the source for ALT1 leads to an error page. Personally, I feel the main hook and ALT3 are the more appealing. Overall I prefer ALT3. The nominator's review of Weight plate satisfies QPQ. Sorry for my poor review. I was new to the DYK process as a whole, I hope this review is up to par. Jionunez (talk) 09:07, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
