| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notability
edit@Ipigott: Dear Ian,
Hopefully you can help me understand why this article is being observed by user FugerCh100. The article on Dr. Sonia meets the following criteria on Wikipedia:Notability (academics):
Academics meeting any one of the following conditions, as substantiated through reliable sources, are notable. Academics meeting none of these conditions may still be notable if they meet the conditions of WP:BIO or other notability criteria. The merits of an article on the academic will depend largely on the extent to which it is verifiable. Before applying these criteria, see the General notes and Specific criteria notes sections, which follow.
2. The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level - Has recieved several awards in Ecuador based on her Academic Merit, and contribution to society.
6. The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative post at a major academic institution or major academic society. - Has held the title of Rector, and is now Chancellor of Universidad Del Pacífico
Any Biography The person has an entry in a country's standard national biographical dictionary: Diccionario Biografico Ecuatoriano 1986 Vol 2.
I thank you before hand for your time,--HarveyPrototype (talk) 23:06, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
@Ipigott: Dear Ian,
This page has been observed again this time by user Allan Nonymous. Despite the criteria being on the Talk page. Perhaps you can help me understand what criteria is not being met?
The citation requests reliable secondary sources independent of the topic. Are these criteria not being met? HarveyPrototype (talk) 17:47, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- @HarveyPrototype: I can only assume that the reviewer has noticed that some of the citations could be considered primary or just brief mentions although in my opinion you have included many valid secondary sources justifying notability. I think it would be useful to discuss the issue with the reviewer.--Ipigott (talk) 06:31, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you HarveyPrototype (talk) 13:05, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
@Allan Nonymous: The notibility template has already been reviewed and lifted for this page over 2 years ago. 2curprev 10:36, 24 January 2022 Ipigott talk contribs 15,459 bytes −30 del tag - no longer applicable The article has also been reviewed by the by the science and academia work group and has been assesed by that respective wikiproject. I will procede to delete the Notability template HarveyPrototype (talk) 02:45, 15 May 2024 (UTC)