Talk:South Asian Stone Age

India: History Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.

Pakistan Low‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Pakistani history.

Bangladesh Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The article falls into the work area of the History workgroup of WikiProject Bangladesh

WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:

Add more images to Bangladesh Liberation War and related pages
Clean up Climate change in Bangladesh, it needs a lot of work
Clean up History of Bangladesh after independence, it needs NPOV
Improve Bangladesh back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengali language back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengalis and related pages
Take a look at the requested articles.
Make a MRT line 3 article.
Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to New Eskaton.

Archaeology

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Incomplete coverage

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Sites such as Jwalapuram with human stone age activity even before 75000 years ago, are not mentioned at all.

Actually Jwalapuram is dated to right around that time, so it doesn't contradict anything. But linking it to the page would make sensespiderwing (talk) 14:20, 2 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Untitled

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This article proposes to discuss the Paleolithic and Mesolithic, but then discusses the Paleolithic and Neolithic. I agree that the article about the "stone age" should discuss the Neolithic, but what happened to the Mesolithic? Stepp-Wulf 02:49, 30 June 2007 (UTC).Reply

This article is too short. India's most important neolithic site (Burzahom) does not appear. Mehrgarh in Pakistan is not much better. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:6B:D10:7C01:BC42:1B91:9B92:E1DB (talk) 07:55, 4 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject class rating

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 19:53, 9 November 2007 (UTC) Please do see if you can incorporate the latest findings from Attirampakkam in South india, attesting to the findings of Achuleian tools in a site there, dated to 1.2-1.5 million years ago. this fact might alter/modify some of the hypotheses here. http://www.antiquity.ac.uk/projgall/pappu297/Reply

Parthasarathy Vallabhajosyula — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.201.135.74 (talk) 06:44, 30 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

"dated to 1.2-1.5 million years ago"

dated how??Wikibearwithme (talk) 05:01, 3 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:South Asian Stone Age/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

its simply superb v cant say any thing about this website

Last edited at 08:24, 9 September 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 06:34, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Reorganization

Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article right now is a bit all over the place - it jumps back and forth between different species, sites, and periods without much of a clear order. Plus, some sections mix details about tools, cultural phases, and specific sites without giving enough background or context, so it’s tough for readers to understand why certain findings are important.

Any input on an organization schema is much appreciated. QuillThrills (talk) 02:34, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic